On the 23rd of Nov, a week before I left for Copenhagen, I had written in my diary that the trip to Cph would be transformative in terms of personal and professional growth. This was still when I knew little about Denmark or Copenhagen or the workshop that was generously paying for my trip.
Two weeks later, I can unequivocally state that it was indeed transformative. Some meandering thoughts that I would like to pen down before they get lost forever in the ether of my brain:
a) Am proud of myself for not only battling imposter syndrome, but also for learning to be by myself- no crutches in the form of friends, family, work or being busy. I spent a week just...being. And I was healthy, in mind, spirit and body. It has taken time and effort to reach this degree of comfort with myself, and with this level of awareness of my emotions. I was worried earlier this year when RK broached the idea of him going to Australia to learn and practice aboriginal medicine, but I am happy that I have made the effort to learn to be by myself. We love spending time with each other, but have learned to give the other space to grow. Khalil Gibran's poem about the oak and cypress resonates and inspires me.
b) Some thoughts about OneHealth and production and economics: Denmark's economy is largely fuelled by the pig industry- they are among the world's largest exporters of piglets and pig meat. They also export milk and cattle meat. A lot of effort has gone into ensuring that the production of pigs or cattle meat or milk is not affected by infectious diseases, nor does it over-depend on the use of antimicrobial medicines. This is achieved through stringent infection control methods (they have eradicated multiple diseases from their country, over the past 200 years, thanks to investments in health literacy, technology, biosecurity practices and hygiene) and eradication of carriers and potential carriers of disease. For instance, to prevent African Swine Flu and to reduce Salmonella and Campylobacter infections, Denmark's policy has been to intensify infection control through stringent sterilisation practices of people and equipment (at the farms, slaughter houses and the vehicles for transportation) coming into contact with pig meat. But in order to absolutely prevent any cases of ASF, they have also blocked any entry of wild boars into the country and have killed any wild boars that happened to be in the country. I understand the need for ASF prevention and how it may cross-over to humans once it spreads in pigs, but does OneHealth also mean not allowing other animals to live for the benefit of humans and our industries? This definition of OneHealth is a thought-provoking one. If farmers depend on production for their loans and the finance system of Denmark is geared towards maximising the number of pigs that can be produced per farm, then there is a strong positive feedback for continuous growth- more land for each pig farm, more piglets per sow, more meat per pig, more chances for infection, more intensified infection control through whatever ways work. It is a system driven by numbers and by measurement and constantly towards "More".
Thanks to Dr. Amit Kanani, I learned something about the Indian veterinary and animal husbandry industry. Our policies could definitely do with decreasing antimicrobial use and increasing efforts to prevent infections in animals through stringent hygiene, for sure. For certain diseases, like Avian Influenza, we too cull the infected and potentially infected animals and intensify surveillance around the epicentres of such outbreaks. But we also use a lot of vaccines to prevent diseases or to treat animals for many diseases. Certainly there are economic reasons for promoting vaccination and surveillance over extermination of reservoirs, but there are also cultural and philosophical reasons for doing so. He had mentioned how "Vasudaiva Kutumbakam" - the world is our family- is a driving philosophy for the policies followed and I am struck by this aspect of OneHealth too.
So, it has been an eye-opening experience to realise that people across the world do not have the same general idea or definitions about OneHealth- clearly there are factors of path dependency, political, financial and economic ecosystems, culture, philosophy and history that colour one's definition at an individual level and influence policies at a country level, or even a continent level. If OneHealth, a term that seems perfectly obvious on the surface, has so many meanings and connotations, is it any wonder that terms like sustainability, climate change, resilience etc are so deeply debated and indeed, fought over?
c) Another term that was discussed during this meeting that struck a chord in me was "Degrowth". I should thank the Green Solutions Centre group for bringing it up. Dr. Peter used the example of the pig industry to wonder if the global policy towards "More" was compatible with the urgent need for sustainability. He acknowledged the immense difficulty in reversing this trend. These conversations were triggered by the wonderful exhibit of veterinary history curated by Dr.Nathalia Brichet, a social anthropologist at the Dept of Veterinary Medicine, who asks these questions and makes us think about what our world views are, what we are willing to sacrifice and where we draw the line and how these change with different backgrounds and cultures. As a student of Complex Adaptive Systems, I found this exhibition and the conversations triggered by it truly exemplary and memorable.
d) I found the talk on the Danish model of collaboration by Lis Alban of Seges Innovation full of wisdom. She talked about transparency, honest communication and a true desire for participation by all stakeholders that have led to the policies on food and everything else. She represents the private sector and it was really interesting to learn about the Danish Veterinary and Food Council, which despite having a name that seems to suggest that it is a government body, is actually a cooperative of private industries and individuals invested in the companies that produce and export. Despite the overwhelming diversity of India, I do believe there is an Indian model of collaboration too, and who knows, perhaps one day I will be able to crystallise the essence of it as concisely and clearly as Lis was able to about her country.
e) The trip enabled me to learn about the deep and inspiring work of my own fellow Indians- Dr. Yas Sandul, Dr. Deepak Saxena and Dr. Amit Kanani. I look forward to being in touch with them and learning more from them.
f) Finally, at a personal level, I am thankful for so many things:
- the expansion of mind that this trip has afforded me, including my utter surprise and delight at the clever use of technology and architecture at the CityHub capsule hotel. I am determined to use this expansion as a way to solve mundane problems in business management through innovation and not merely manpower.
- the time away from the urgencies of day to day life. I was able to run regularly (crossed 6km! It's taken over a year, but I feel like a real runner at last!), eat mindfully and spend my time the way I wanted to, for over a week. What privilege!
- the kids for managing themselves so well and being so open to and supportive of their mom happily traipsing away
- my laboratory for running itself fairly smoothly and effectively. It is a testament to the systems and the people and I couldn't be more proud.
This trip has facilitated an openness to exploring opportunities outside of India and broadening my horizons in many different ways.